Comparisons for author-selected inputs or userprovided inputs: (a) visual stylized results by MAST and ArtFusion, (b) quantitative statistic by various AST methods.
Material
Abstract
Despite the remarkable process in the field of arbitrary image style transfer (AST), inconsistent evaluation continues to plague style transfer research. Existing methods often suffer from limited objective evaluation and inconsistent subjective feedback, hindering reliable comparisons among AST variants. In this study, we propose a multi-granularity assessment system that combines standardized objective and subjective evaluations. We collect a fine-grained dataset considering a range of image contexts such as different scenes, object complexities, and rich parsing information from multiple sources. Objective and subjective studies are conducted using the collected dataset. Specifically, we innovate on traditional subjective studies by developing an online evaluation system utilizing a combination of point-wise, pair-wise, and group-wise questionnaires. Finally, we bridge the gap between objective and subjective evaluations by examining the consistency between the results from the two studies. We experimentally evaluate CNN-based, flow-based, transformer-based, and diffusion-based AST methods by the proposed multi-granularity assessment system, which lays the foundation for a reliable and robust evaluation. Providing standardized measures, objective data, and detailed subjective feedback empowers researchers to make informed comparisons and drive innovation in this rapidly evolving field. Finally, for our online evaluation system, please see http://ivc.ia.ac.cn/.